ModMed
بواسطة Modernizing Medicine, Inc
Specialty-Specific Design: Highly praised for being tailored for specific medical specialties (e.g., Dermatology, Ophthalmology, Orthopedics). This design includes built-in knowledge and adaptive learning that customizes to the provider's workflow, leading to faster, more detailed documentation.
Ease of Use and Intuitive Interface: The overall system and particularly the EMA EHR are found to be user-friendly, intuitive, and easy to navigate compared to other EMRs. The native iPad format is a highlight for clinical staff, offering flexibility for data entry in the exam room.
Integrated, All-in-One Solution: The system is valued for its seamless integration between the EHR (EMA) and Practice Management (PM) components, which streamlines check-in, check-out, clinical charting, and billing in one platform.
Efficient Documentation & Coding: Features like automated note-writing, quick text, and auto-suggested ICD-10 and CPT coding (including modifiers) significantly save time for providers and reduce administrative burden.
Robust Features: Users appreciate the comprehensive feature set, including the Patient Portal, two-way calendar syncing, and automated reminders, which enhance patient engagement and practice efficiency.
System Glitches and Instability: Users frequently report system glitches, bugs, and crashes that interrupt the workday. The platform is sometimes described as slow, with sluggish performance, especially when handling analytics and faxing.
Poor Post-Implementation Customer Support: While initial support is often good, many users experience poor responsiveness and inadequate follow-up on complex issues after implementation. Support quality is often described as inconsistent and depending on the representative.
Reporting and Analytics Module: The analytics and reporting features are frequently criticized. They are often described as cumbersome, slow, and inadequate for meeting specific reporting requirements of the practice.
